The former president of the Spanish government speaks out on the Iranian conflict, calling for support for the allies and criticizing the attitude of the current government.Breaking News, International, Policy, international conflict, diplomacy, Spanish government, military intervention, Iran, José María Aznar, Middle East, Spanish foreign policy, international relations, global security, AFE PACKAGE, newsThe former president of the Spanish government speaks out on the Iranian conflict, calling for support for the allies and criticizing the attitude of the...
The former president of the Spanish government, José María Aznar, took a position this Wednesday March 11, 2026 during a conference at Forinvest, the financial fair in Valencia, on the international situation concerning Iran. In a marked speech, he defended the need to complete the military operations initiated by the United States and Israel, while sharply criticizing the position adopted by the government of Pedro Sánchez.
According to Aznar, military interventions must be carried out to their logical conclusion, without leaving situations unresolved. This statement comes against a backdrop of growing tensions in the Middle East, where several Western powers have intensified their actions against the Iranian regime. The former leader of the People's Party insisted on the importance of consistency in international commitments.
Aznar's speech particularly targeted the Spanish position in this conflict. He accused the current government of siding with traditional enemies rather than supporting Spain's historic allies. This position comes as Pedro Sánchez's executive had expressed reservations regarding military operations in Iran, favoring a diplomatic approach.
The former president justified the military intervention in Iran by the need to counter what he describes as a “regime that exports terrorism”. For several decades, according to Aznar, Iran has represented a constant threat to international security, thus justifying firmer actions on the part of the international community. This argument is part of a geopolitical vision where military force remains a legitimate instrument of foreign policy.
The Valencia conference was also an opportunity for Aznar to express his reservations regarding certain international leaders. While recognizing the faults of former US President Donald Trump, whom he describes as a “populist”, he drew unfavorable comparisons with the head of the Spanish government. This double criticism illustrates the complexity of alliances and perceptions in contemporary international relations.
Aznar's statements come at a crucial moment for European foreign policy. While the European Union seeks to define a common position on the Iranian issue, the divergent positions of former and current national leaders complicate the search for consensus. The question of the legitimacy of military interventions continues to divide European chancelleries.
The Forinvest event, where this conference was held, attracted a large audience, requiring the addition of additional seats to accommodate all participants. This enthusiasm reflects the continuing interest of the public and economic circles in international political issues, particularly in a context of increased geopolitical volatility.
The position defended by Aznar reflects a realistic vision of international relations, where security considerations often take precedence over diplomatic approaches. This perspective contrasts with that of the current Spanish government, creating a public debate on the direction of national foreign policy in an increasingly unstable world.
Discover more from AFE PACKAGE
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
