A controversial decision by President Joe Biden to provide Ukraine with cluster munitions, despite their history of killing civilians, is sparking international debate.
The president defended his decision, saying it took time to to be convinced, but that he had acted because “the Ukrainians were short of ammunition”.
The envoy of Moscow criticized Washington's decision, while human rights groups and some Democrats also criticized the decision.
Cluster bombs were used by both Russia and Ukraine during the war.
A thorough investigation is underway to determine how these bombs could have been transferred to Ukraine.
The use of these munitions poses a grave menace for the vies civil, even for a long time after the end of the conflict, selon Amnesty International.
Despite the criticism, President Biden maintained his position, saying the bombs sent to Ukraine were much safer than those used by Russia.
The decision to supply cluster munitions to Ukraine will allow Ukrainian forces to confront Russia more effectively, according to the Pentagon spokesperson.
The debate around the decision highlights the challenges policymakers face in striking a balance between protecting civilians and supporting allies in conflict.
The groups of defense of human rights urge theimmediate stop of the use of these munitions, while American politicians are divided on this issue.
The situation remains tense in Ukraine, where the counter-offensive continues in the Donetsk and Zaporizhia regions.
The debate over the use of cluster munitions in Ukraine continues to rage as NATO member nations prepare for a major summit next week.
We will continue to monitor this evolving situation closely and provide updates as new information becomes available. Don’t forget to stay informed on the latest developments by visiting our website paketafe.com.